Delenda Est Carthago

Why not delve into a twisted mind? Thoughts on the world, history, politics, entertainment, comics, and why all shall call me master!

Location: Mesa, Arizona, United States

I plan on being the supreme dictator of the country, if not the world. Therefore, you might want to stay on my good side. Just a hint: ABBA rules!


Why didn't I love Inglourious Basterds?

I saw Quentin Tarantino's newest movie last week. I enjoyed the hell out of it. Really. But it was kind of like junk food, wasn't it?

I got in a bit of an argument with the guy at my comic book store about this. I told him that after we saw Inglourious Basterds, I couldn't figure out what the point was. He told me it didn't need a point. But I disagree! Yes, this is America! Disagreement is the spice of life!

Let me start by saying that I really enjoyed it. I just wrote it above, didn't I? Tarantino certainly knows how to put a movie together, and he's dynamite with actors. He often gets career-best performances out of actors. Brad Pitt is fantastic and funny, Mélanie Laurent is hard-ass and steely, Diane Kruger is wonderfully glamorous, and the Basterds themselves are excellent. Christoph Waltz is getting all the Oscar talk, and he's astonishing as Colonel Hans Landa, the "Jew Hunter." He's amazingly evil and refreshingly civil, except when, stunningly, he's not. The opening scene, when he shows up at a Frenchman's farm looking for a Jewish family, is one of the tensest scenes Tarantino has come up with in years. Waltz does a wonderful job with this utter opportunist, who does his job well but isn't above getting something for himself. Tarantino, naturally, comes up with some excellent action (a Mexican stand-off? in a Tarantino film? you don't say!) and sudden and shocking violence, and he reaches into his usual bag of tricks to twist the narrative around a bit - not as well as he's done in the past, but he's still a very good filmmaker. The grand finale is a wonderful orgy of violence and sly humor, and the final scene is a nice touch. Plus, Mike Myers is hilarious in his brief scene.

So what's my problem? Why can't I love this movie? Well, as I wrote, it's junk food. I couldn't quite figure out why Tarantino made this movie and what he's trying to say. My friend said it doesn't matter, that I should just enjoy it for the entertainment. However, I said that Tarantino has been making movies for almost 20 years, and he hasn't made one with something interesting to say since Jackie Brown, which came out in 1997 (granted, he's only directed two movies in between that one and this one, but still). We know he can make dazzling technical movies and that he can get excellent work out of his actors. Can he do anything else?

Getting back to Inglourious Basterds (and yes, I'm going to SPOIL it, so read no further if you really want to see it clean): What's Tarantino really trying to say? Ultimately, this is Death Wish with better financing and better acting. It's a revenge fantasy, and while I don't have an issue with revenge fantasies per se, Tarantino's last big movie, Kill Bill, was also a revenge fantasy. Revenge obviously plays a big role in all of his movies, to the degree that he's almost pathological about it, but does it need to be the driving force of this movie? We've heard the objections to the movie, about how it distorts history and is therefore disrespectful to Jews, because Tarantino's belief that killing Hitler somehow makes up for the millions slaughtered by the Nazis. I didn't get that - this is like a lot of old-time World War II movies, in which the Holocaust is virtually ignored because it gets in the way of a good action movie. Sure, Tarantino can make an action movie set in World War II in which he gleefully kills the Nazi High Command - I don't have a problem with that. I guess my objection is more with the tone of the movie. Tarantino seems to be far too gleeful about this movie, and it jars with the somewhat serious tone the movie has for a good deal of it. I wasn't particularly uncomfortable with Brad Pitt being a cheery psychopath, for instance - his attitude seems to be the one you need in a horrible war. It just seems like Tarantino, for all his gifts as a filmmaker, simply wants to revel in what he can do instead of trying for something more. If we look at someone like Scorsese, for instance, as an example of someone who has always resisted stereotyping. We might think of him as a director who makes bleak movies often starring Italian-American New York gangsters, but he's made a lot of different kinds of movies - he made The Age of Innocence, The Last Temptation of Christ, After Hours, The Last Waltz, and Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, for crying out loud. Scorsese is a great director because he doesn't let himself get pigeonholed. Tarantino, it seems, pigeonholes himself.

I suppose I'm not explaining myself very well. Tarantino is a gifted filmmaker, but he's content to mine the movies he saw in his childhood for inspiration and simply update things with tongue in cheek. Inglourious Basterds is a "remake" of an old Italian movie, for instance. I assume that Tarantino has seen the great World War II movies of the 1960s and 1970s, because that's when he was growing up. But even those movies took the war seriously, even if they had some humor. Tarantino takes nothing seriously, apparently, and because he doesn't make straight comedies, he usually falls short of greatness because of this. At least that's what I think. Maybe I'm not getting it across very well. Sorry!

Anyway, Inglourious Basterds is a marvelous movie to watch. I just didn't get enough out of it. Oh well.

Labels: , , ,


Blogger Nik said...

Y'know, I liked Basterds the more and more I thought about it. Quentin is a film nut whose entire career is about making movies that refer to movies, which is rather self-referential, but I think in his case it often works (when it doesn't, you get "Grindhouse").

An essay I *really* liked that gave me a hell of a lot to chew on about this movie, and that it might be deeper than it appears on first glance:

25/9/09 5:07 PM  
Blogger Greg said...

Nik: Thanks for the link. I love reading critical analyses of movies and other literarute.

26/9/09 9:46 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

It's not a revenge fantasy. And people who complained about historical inaccuracy (because Hitler dies at the end) didn't get it either.

If you watch the movie you'll see that it doesn't care about the "true story" at all; in fact it actively ignores history. And that's actually the point.

This movie isn't about WW2, it's mostly about the power of fiction to reinvent and recreate history (as it so often does). There are many levels to this movie, and several themes are explored - and the movie's second half actually subverts its audience's expectations, by showing a nazi audience watching a nazi-propaganda film and cheering allied soldiers' deaths with the same gusto that Tarantino's audience felt when the "Inglorious Basterds" tortured nazis. After giving his audience a bit of sadistic pleasure in the Basterds' brutal interrogation of a group of nazis, Tarantino offers a mirror to his audience in the movie-theather sequence as if he were saying "that's what you looked like a little while ago, when you were cheering for the Basterds' atrocities".

Christoph Waltz is OUTSTANDING, and steals almost every scene he participates in.

And I also disagreed with friends who complained that the scenes being too long; in this scene Tarantino builds suspense like a fvcking master. The dialogues are captivating and the tension in these "long" dialogue scenes builds and builds and builds until it bursts into gruesome violence. Sometimes it looks like the sh!t is about to hit the fan, then something apparently defuses the tension, but suddenly someone slips and then the sh!t hits the fan really hard. Despite all the suspenseful dialogue and the movie's duration, I didn't feel the time pass, and in the end felt that the movie was very well paced (but anyone who goes in expecting a straight action movie will be disappointed).

28/10/09 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Microsoft Office
Office 2010
Microsoft Office 2010
Office 2010 key
Office 2010 download
Office 2010 Professional
Microsoft outlook
Outlook 2010
Windows 7
Microsoft outlook 2010

7/11/10 8:23 PM  

It is so good to read your article. Thank you for sharing!
Eeveryone love fashion clothing, Polo Ralph Lauren is very popular all over world, that is my dream to get Ralph Lauren Polo Shirts.We know Ray Ban by America soldier, all of them wear Ray Ban Sunglasses when they walk on the road, it is fashionable for you.

14/12/10 4:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We believe Gw2field, to put it differently establishing assist will be a difficulty * essential inside a game of this sort.The action gets to be a subtracting for many small original artwork, ridiculous account, and several coppied numerous Buy GW2 Gold concepts coming from Wow (the sport isn't revolution, yet a large adequate advancement), but also for some time to accomplish points their own approach. This thinks merely much more modern-day

4/6/13 2:49 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Thanks a lot for sharing and I have some special things for you. If you are in free time:
chuyện hay về tình yêu
quote about finding true love
tai hinh nen song dong
parking games online

20/6/18 1:40 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home